Legal Opinion

Gelfand v. Adjo Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In reviewing the Supreme Court’s determination, made after a nonjury trial, our authority “is as broad as that of the trial court” and we “may render the judgment. . . warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983] [internal quotation marks omitted]). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination that the appellant was not entitled to prior written notice because the appellant created the dangerous…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Kiernan v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Akley v. ClemonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Parks v. HutchinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ryan v. IM Kapco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API