Gelfand v. Adjo Contracting Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In reviewing the Supreme Court’s determination, made after a nonjury trial, our authority “is as broad as that of the trial court” and we “may render the judgment. . . warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983] [internal quotation marks omitted]). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination that the appellant was not entitled to prior written notice because the appellant created the dangerous…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kiernan v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Akley v. ClemonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Parks v. HutchinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ryan v. IM Kapco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011