People v. Solis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The appellant was charged with the crime of possession of marijuana in violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code. In a trial by jury, he was found guilty. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The appellant asserts that his conviction cannot stand because there were three prejudicial errors committed in the course of the trial. He contends: 1. A probation officer should not have been permitted to relate a conversation he had with the appellant. 2. Evidence of other acts of the appellant *70should not have been admitted under the guise…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. KlorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. HancockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. FreytasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. IrvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. NailorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. NeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.