McAllister v. Clopton
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Monroe County. Hon. O. H. Whitfield, Chancellor. The facts in the case are very fully stated in the opinion of the court. The following is assigned for error: That the court erred in sustaining the motion to dissolve the injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtSimrall, J.
This appeal is brought to review the decree of the chancery court, made at the final hearing dismissing the bill. The case was once before in this court, on appeal from a decree dissolving the injunction.
Mary McAllister claims to be the owner of the property which the appellee, the administrator of Thomas Brandon, deceased, is attempting to sell, under a special judgment, founded on a me*258chanic’s lien, for certain erections and buildings put upon the property, under a contract with her husband and one Eerris. The bill seeks a perpetual injunction against the sale.
The complainant alleges that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Christian v. O'NealMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- Otley v. Haviland, Clark & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1858
- Reynolds v. NelsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by8 opinions
- FIRST NAT. BK. OF GREENVILLE v. VirdenMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
- Weiss, Dreyfous & Seiferth, Inc. v. Natchez Inv. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Mead v. DayMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Church v. SmitheaColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hopper v. OverstreetMississippi Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.