Legal Opinion

White v. Bachner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1994No. 93-1436Published

1Per curiam

Charles G. White appeals from an order of the trial court granting final summary judgment in a claim on a promissory note. We affirm.

The trial court correctly granted summary judgment because there is no evidence of any release, waiver, novation, or discharge of the valid promissory note. “A promissory note admitted into evidence is sufficient, without other extrinsic proof, to establish a prima facie case in an action on the note.” Perez v. Rivero, 634 So.2d 914, 916 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); see also Hay cook v. Ostman, 397 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). There is no written release. See Deese v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Deese v. MobleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Haycook v. OstmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API