Legal Opinion

Eikenberry v. McFall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1941No. 103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*527OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of plaintiffs’ appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Preble County, Ohio.

First, we are presented with a motion filed by counsel for the defendantsap-pellees, asking that appeal proceedings be dismissed on the claimed ground that no bill of exceptions has been filed by appellants in our court.

We have reason to believe that it very frequently happens that bills of exceptions are not properly filed in our court due to the fact that counsel and Clerks of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zeigler Milling Co. v. DenmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Lumpkin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Robinson-Lloyds, Ltd. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Weis v. WeisOhio Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API