Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Madis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenberger, J.

This is an action by The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (Equitable) for a judgment declaring that defendant insured Mark S. Madis, M.D. (Madis) is not entitled to benefits pursuant to two reinstated noncancelable disability insurance policies. Equitable’s denial of coverage is based solely on the reinstated policies’ exclusion of coverage for disabilities caused by pre-existing conditions. Madis counters that since the disability occurred more than two years after the date of reinstatement, he is protected by the incontestability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Berkshire Life Insurance v. WeinigNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Monarch Life Insurance v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Kear v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Kear v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Reliastar Life Insurance v. LeopoldNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API