Legal Opinion

Pacific Insurance v. Lovern

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1965No. 43699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, C. J.

J. Hubert Lovern and wife, holders of a storm, rain and hail insurance policy in Pacific Insurance Company of New York, on July 28, 1964, filed their bill of com*806plaint against the company to recover the sum of $3,000 for damages, allegedly resulting from such hazard on April 10, 1962.

The defendant company, in its answer, denied that it owed the complainants the sum of $3,000 or any sum whatever. It pleaded that the insured, under the provisions of the policy, were under the duty to give it immediate notice of such loss; and, in compliance with a standard provision thereof, within sixty days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canal Ins. Co. v. Bush & KingMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Napp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Coahoma County Bank & Trust Co. v. FeinburgMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Old Colony Insurance v. Fagan Chevrolet Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hood v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1976
  2. Mississippi v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Prassel Enterprises, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. State of Mississippi Ex Rel., Etc., Hinds County v. J.W. "Jake" Richardson v. Forum Insurance Co., Garnishee-Defendant-Appellee. J.W. "Jake" Richardson v. Forum Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Richard v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API