Legal Opinion

Patel v. Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 26, 2018No. 16-2376Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

16‐2376 Patel v. Sessions BIA Straus, IJ A206 066 098 A206 057 302 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Xue Hong Yang v. United States Department of Justice and Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Jigme Wangchuck v. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Agus Hasari Steevenez v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Garcia-Villeda v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Burger v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API