Legal Opinion
Crawley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 8, 1989No. 87-767PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant’s contention that he was misadvised as to the consequences of his nolo contendere plea is not properly presented in a direct appeal; it should be raised in the trial court on a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion to vacate pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The appeal is dismissed.
FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ponderosa, Inc. v. StephensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Strong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- McCarty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992