Legal Opinion

Crawley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 1989No. 87-767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant’s contention that he was misadvised as to the consequences of his nolo contendere plea is not properly presented in a direct appeal; it should be raised in the trial court on a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion to vacate pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The appeal is dismissed.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ponderosa, Inc. v. StephensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Strong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. McCarty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992