Legal Opinion

Alamo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 9, 2017No. 2015-5149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hughes, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, current and former Army emergency medical technicians and paramedics, appeal the Court of Federal Claims’ determination that the government properly compensates them for their regularly scheduled overtime work under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Because we find that the government employs the correct methodology to determine Appellants’ pay, we affirm.

I

During the relevant period, the Army employed Appellants (EMTs) to provide emergency medical services at Fort Stewart, Liberty, Georgia. Before October 2012, the EMTs were generally scheduled for a compressed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Michael Zumerling v. Donald J. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Alan A. Abreu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Crooker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe No. 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  2. Pacific Coast Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API