Legal Opinion

Keith Joseph Burg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 1969No. 22619PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge:

The appellant Burg, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in a jury trial in the District Court, of bank robbery, a violation of Title 18, United States Code, § 2113 (a). He has appealed. There is no problem concerning the jurisdiction of the District Court or of this court.

The appellant states, as his grounds for appeal:

A. It was prejudicial error for the trial court to refuse defendant’s motion that the Government not be allowed to ask any questions with regard to whether the defendant had prior felony convictions, upon the representation that the defendant would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. John I. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Tom PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Larry Wayne Helberg and David Landworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Bustillos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. United States v. Odell MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. George L. Smith v. B. J. Rhay, Warden of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Leroy Shorter, Also Known as Roy Lee Shorter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API