Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 18, 1945No. 9511PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

By this original proceeding relators, James E. Ferguson and Joe Lee Ferguson, seek to perpetually restrain or enjoin respondent A. M. Ferguson, as follows:

1. From prosecuting cause No. 20211 in the District Court of Bell County, Texas.

2. From prosecuting in any court in the State of Texas any suit, motion, action, or proceeding which has for its purpose or seeks to question, modify, set aside, annul, alter, or interfere with the enforcement of the former judgment of this court in the case of Ferguson et al. v. Ferguson et al., 181 S.W.2d 601, writ of error refused for want of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. City of PalestineTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cattlemens Trust Co. of Ft. Worth v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Reed v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Adams v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TriggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. DixonTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Garlington v. WassonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API