Legal Opinion

Duke v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 2021No. S20A1522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

311 Ga. 135

FINAL COPY S20A1522. DUKE v. THE STATE. MELTON, Chief Justice. We granted interlocutory review in this case1 to decide whether the trial court erred in determining that an indigent defendant in a criminal case who is represented by private, pro bono counsel has neither a statutory right under the Indigent Defense Act of 2003, OCGA § 17-12-1 et seq. (“IDA”), nor a constitutional right to state- funded experts and investigators needed to prepare a defense. Contrary to the trial court’s conclusion, the IDA allows an indigent defendant to obtain such ancillary defense services through…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. NORTH AMERICAN SENIOR BENEFITS, LLC v. WIMMERSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  2. Roberts v. Unison Behavioral HealthSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. Dwight Lleywilln Nails v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
  4. Rodrigo Adolpho Amaya v. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  5. Rodrigo Adolpho Amaya v. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API