Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Eiland

Staunton County Circuit Court

Decided April 18, 1978No. Case No. 4889Published

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE ROSCOE B. STEPHENSON, JR.

The petitioners, Howard M. Hanna and Mary E. Hanna, pray for the issuance of a writ of mandamus against the respondents requiring them to bring suit to enforce the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Staunton. The respondents consist of the members of the City Planning Commission, the members of the City Council, the City Manager, the City Building Official and five property owners, namely: David W. Brown, Inc., Theodore G. Osborne, Louise W. Osborne, John W. Barnard and Mary O. Barnard (referred to as "the owners").

Petitioners allege that the owners have failed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richmond-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  2. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. FugateSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Davis v. DuschSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Andrews v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  5. May v. WhitlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API