Monitor Plow Works v. Born
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J. cited, contending that the admission of incompetent testimony was reversible error: Dunbier v. Bay, 12 Neb., 600; High v. Bank, 6 Id., 157; Mseleyv. Malehow, 9 Id., 180. cited, as to the evidence of previous offense: 1 Greenleaf, Evidence [13th Ed.], sec. 53 n.; as to burden of proof: First Natl.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J. cited, contending that the admission of incompetent testimony was reversible error: Dunbier v. Bay, 12 Neb., 600; High v. Bank, 6 Id., 157; Mseleyv. Malehow, 9 Id., 180. cited, as to the evidence of previous offense: 1 Greenleaf, Evidence [13th Ed.], sec. 53 n.; as to burden of proof: First Natl. Bank v. Carson, 30 Neb., 104; as to admission of testimony: Dillon v. Russell, 5 Neb., 484; Polland v. Turner, 22 Id., 366; Brooks v. Dutcher, Id., 644; McClure v. Lavender, 21 Id., 181; Brown v. Iilock, 5 N. Y. Sup., 245;…
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This action was brought in the court below by the plaintiff in error against Richard Born and C. Neidig to recover the amount of a promissory note purported to be given by Richard Born to Neidig, and indorsed by the latter to the plaintiff. The petition is in the usual form.
Neidig answered, confessing the allegations of the petition. The answer of Richard Born is a general denial. The court entered judgment against Neidig for the full amount of the note and interest. The issue presented by the answer of the defendant Born was tried to a jury, who returned a verdict in favor of the defendant,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First National Bank v. CarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. TourtelotteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Exchange Bank v. GiffordNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Rickertsen v. CarskadonNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Hunt v. Van BurgNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Graves v. Norfolk National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896