Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 2016No. 15-354Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONERY,. J.,

concurs in part, dissents in part,- and assigns reasons.

hi respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s ruling to grant a new trial from the first jury verdict' in favor ’ of Teleflex. I would re-vérse'and render-judgment in favor of Teleflex, dismissing all of plaintiffs claims with prejudicé at his cost. This decision renders moot all remaining assignments of error. There are three separate appeals consolidated and considered together. I will discuss' only the appeal in docket number 15-1113 alleging trial court error by granting a new trial from…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Bloxom v. BloxomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API