Legal Opinion
HartfordSteam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cartier
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error to Mason. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Suit is brought to recover the premium upon a policy of insurance, issued and delivered to-defendant.'
The policy was for three years, was dated February 14, 1890, was sent by mail to defendant, and received by him February 18. The policy contained the following clause:
“This policy may also be canceled, at the request of' the assured, in case' of the sale, lease, transfer, or destruction of the boilers insured, or the buildings containing the same, or if the boiler or boilers shall cease to be used for a period of more than three months, provided the premium has been paid, in which case the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gristock v. Royal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Haapa v. Metropolitan Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Summers v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Overland Southern Motor Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.