Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McNeal

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 13, 1948No. 39055Published

1DissentHawthorne, Justice

I fully subscribe to the decree in the majority opinion insofar as it affirms the verdict of the conviction, and to the reasons given therefor, but cannot subscribe to that portion of the decree which affirms the sentence because I am of the opinion that the sentence is illegal, null, and void and is no sentence whatsoever, and that for this reason the case should be remanded to the district court for the judge to impose a legal sentence.

Since the defendant was charged in the bill of information with the theft of a horse valued at $100, under Article 67 of the Louisiana Criminal Code, for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. State v. DaleoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. State v. McCrocklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. State v. ToneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Cutrer v. PitcherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API