Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Swales

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 23, 1958No. [No. 237, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Weiner, a practicing attorney, lent the appellees, the Swaleses, $3,157.00, and took a confessed judgment note payable on demand, in which the borrowers agreed upon default “to pay the costs and charges for collecting same, including attorney’s commission of fifteen (15%) per cent for collection (said 15% to be entered as part of the costs)”, and authorized the entry of judgment for the amount of the note “including debt, interest and costs * * There was default and Weiner filed a declaration, which he signed as attorney, claiming the principal amount with interest and costs and 15%…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webster v. People's Loan, Savings & Deposit BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. Johnson v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  3. Sanders v. NicolsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Gaither v. TolsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  5. Bowie v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. James L. Martin v. Commercial Securities Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Reese v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. United States v. Thomas GannonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Mortgage Investors v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API