Orient Ins. v. Ariasi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action at law tried by the court without a jury by written stipulation of the parties. At the close of the testimony neither party challenged the sufficiency of the testimony to support a judgment in favor of the other, and no request of any kind was made for findings, either general or special. Later, the court, by written memorandum, ordered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against each of the defendants in a sum certain and directed the plaintiff to prepare findings and conclusions. Pursuant to this order, the plaintiff submitted findings. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People Ex Rel. Copcutt v. . Board of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Gonch v. Republic Storage Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hazelwood Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ariasi v. Orient Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Abbott v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1942
- Appeal of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930