Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Danylo

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 24, 2014No. 13-0570/AFPublished

1Dissent

BAKER, Chief Judge,

with whom ERDMANN, Judge, joins (dissenting):

I would reverse this case. In my view, all four Barker v. Wingo factors favor Appellant. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). The second and fourth factors do not weigh heavily in his favor, but they weigh in his favor nonetheless. Thus, if Barker v. Wingo is the test for a Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim, and all four factors weigh in favor of Appellant, I do not see how or why he should not prevail on the underlying Sixth Amendment claim. Therefore, I respectfully dis- _ sent.

Discussion

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. MizgalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API