Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Hadzsits

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error -to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Walter G. Hogan against George Hadzsits, Herman Beckmann, and Herman Rohns, formerly copartners as George Hadzsits & Company, for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

February 4,1888, the firm of George Hadzsits & Co. was organized. Herman Bohns was the special partner.' The other two defendants were the general partners. The special partner contributed to the capital stock of said firm the sum of $10,000 in cash. The partnership was to terminate on the 3d day of February, 1892. There is no question raised as to these papers being properly executed to create a limited partnership. At the expiration of this partnership, like articles of special partnership were signed, reciting that the partnership was to commence on the 4th day of February, 1892, and to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haviland v. ChaceNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Haggerty v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Staver & Abbott Manufacturing Co. v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. First National Bank v. HuberNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chick v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API