Legal Opinion
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports
Decided May 23, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
The Honorable Toni Bradford State Representative 8410 Wildcat Drive Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603-9112
Dear Representative Bradford:
I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on the following facts and question:
A Sewer Improvement District (SID) is developed by a sponsor and upon completion, it is turned over to the City's Wastewater Department. Past practice has been for the Wastewater Department to waive connection fees for three (3) years after substantial completion of the district. For all new residential customers (not connecting under the auspices of the SID), the Wastewater…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kraft v. SmothersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Freeman v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Pine Bluff Water Co. v. Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Martin v. HilbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- Branch v. GerlachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.