Legal Opinion

United States v. Armand Schwab & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 2, 1942No. 4401PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division.

Merchandise, consisting of hats composed of manila hemp, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York as hats, bleached, at 25 cents per dozen and 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The importers— appellees — protested, claiming that the hats were not bleached and" were, therefore, dutiable under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) of that act at only 25 per centum ad valorem.

The provisions in question read:

Pab. 1504, * * * (b) Hats, bonnets, and hoods,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. The MargaretSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Donat & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. United States v. BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bar Zel Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  2. Protests 83013-K of Henry Pollak, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API