Post v. Township Board of Sparta
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus to compel approval of liquor bond. The facts ara stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChahplin, J.
On a petition filed by relator, we granted an order requiring the respondents to show cause why a mandamus should not be granted requiring them to approve of the sureties in a certain liquor bond to enable the relator to engage in the business of keeping a saloon in the township of Sparta, Kent county, Michigan. The penalty fixed by the township board for bonds of this kind was $6,000. The law requires at least two sureties, who shall each justify in the amount of the penalty over and above all indebtedness, exemptions, and liability on similar bonds. The law also authorizes and requires the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Devin v. BeltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Divine v. Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1899