Legal Opinion

Iverson v. Knorr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1941No. File No. 8424PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The trial court was of the opinion that plaintiff’s evidence established her contributory negligence as a matter of law, and directed a verdict for defendant at the close of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff predicates error on that ruling.

The conduct of plaintiff is not in dispute. She was able to reconstruct the circumstances of the accident with exactitude.

Negligence of defendant and the causal relation of that negligence to plaintiff’s injury is assumed. Whether, as a matter of law, the exhibited conduct of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Miller v. Sioux Falls Traction SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Dwyer v. PetersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Albers v. OttenbacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Corey v. KocerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Irvin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1957
  4. Winter v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API