Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Lyon District Court. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for plaintiff Holmes, on January 22, 1887. The defendant brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

The defendant in error suggests that the case-made fails to show that all the evidence introduced' at *266the trial is contained therein, and that the judgment- should be affirmed for that reason. If he were correct in his claim, the judgment should be affirmed under the questions submitted for determination here. It is stated however in the case-made following the evidence: “And this Avas all the evidence in the case.'” The attention of some of the witnesses Avas called to a paper executed at the time the note sued upon was signed by the defendant; but there is nothing in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Burson v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Clarke v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Whitmore v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Quinton v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. People's Gas Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. State Bank v. BrecheisenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Redfield State Bank v. MyrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API