Legal Opinion

Gross v. West New Brighton Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 21, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

The facts on the motion for judgment on the pleadings are as follows: By order dated November 20, 1942, the plaintiff was appointed the receiver in supplementary proceedings of the property of Harold Torrone. On November 24, 1942, the plaintiff duly qualified as such receiver by filing the order of his appointment and a duly approved undertaking in the office of the Clerk of the County of Richmond. On November 27, 1942, there was deposited to the judgment debtor’s account in the defendant bank, the sum of $750, and on April 9, 1943, there remained in the account the sum of $13.09. On April 9,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. People v. RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Pittsburgh-Westmoreland Coal Co. v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. People v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & MendelsohnNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gross v. West New Brighton BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API