Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

In reversing the judgment of the civil court the circuit court said:

“I cannot reach the conclusion which the trial court did that the absence of Mrs. Ewing is unexplained. Her age is such that she might very well be alive. She left because conditions at home were unsatisfactory. She has not corresponded with her husband because she informed him when she left he never would hear from her again. Some other evidence must be produced before the plaintiff can prevail.”

We think the circuit court missed the gist of the basis for the presúmption of death that "obtains in case a person is absent for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Page v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. White v. Brotherhood of Locomotive FiremenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Parker v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Egger v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Gavers Ex Rel. Gavers v. Federal Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Delaney v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fink v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hansen v. Central Verein der Gegenseitigen Unterstuetzungs Gesellschaft GermaniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API