Legal Opinion

Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Farrar

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 12, 1990No. 88SC401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

We granted certiorari to consider whether the court of appeals erred in utilizing the “undivided basis” method to resolve a dispute between landlords and a tenant regarding the apportionment of condemnation proceeds, pursuant to a written contract between the parties. Farrar v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 765 P.2d 613 (Colo.App.1988). The trial court’s award of $77,000 to the tenant was reversed by the court of appeals, which held that the tenant was entitled to no compensation because the condemnation proceeds were attributable to the land value of the property taken and not to the improvements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. City of SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Lorenzen v. Mustard's Last Stand, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Dickson v. DickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  4. Farrar v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Liebert Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. JagowColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Farrar, Sr. v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Dunning v. Jefferson County School District R-1District Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  5. Total Petroleum, Inc. v. FarrarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API