Legal Opinion
Winter Storm Shipping. Ltd. v. TPI
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 2002No. 01 CIV 5650 SASPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
On June 21, 2001, Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. (“Winter Storm”) applied ex parte for an order of maritime attachment pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 8 (“FAA”), and Rule B(l) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (“Rule B” or “Rule B(l)”). The order of attachment was granted the same day. See 6/21/01 Ex Parte Order for Process of Maritime Attachment, No. 01 Civ. 5650 (“Order of Attachment” or “Order”).
Defendants Thai Petrochemical Industry and the other defendants (collectively, “TPI”) now move to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shipping Financial Services Corporation v. William J. Drakos, Duke Petroleum Transport Corporation and Omi Petrolink CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TpiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TPICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002