Legal Opinion
Boyle v. Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 2, 2006No. Civil Action 05-CV-4463 (DMC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAVANAUGH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon motion by Defendant Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (“Quest”) to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Douglas Boyle’s (“Mr.Boyle”) and Anthony Gouveia’s (“Mr.Gouveia”) claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. No oral argument was held pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the following reasons, Quest’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
A. Procedural History
Plaintiffs Douglas Boyle (“Mr.Boyle”) and Anthony Gouveia (“Mr.Gouveia”) brought this action…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robb, James v. City of Philadelphia and Mann, Fredric R. And Horowitz, Vladimir and Crawford, Robert W. And Washington, Nathaniel and Doe, JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- TOBIA v. LAKEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION (LBOE)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020