Mendoza v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*454No triable issue of fact exists as to whether the detention, arrest, or prosecution was supported by probable cause, given that the police found plaintiff in a state of undress on premises identified in a valid search warrant as a drug distribution point, and a controlled substance was recovered from those premises (see Martinez v City of Schenectady, 97 NY2d 78, 85 [2001]; People v Mayo, 59 AD3d 250, 254-255 [2009], affd 13 NY3d 767 [2009]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and AbdusSalaam, JJ.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martinez v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. MayoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Luna v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Suero v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020