Legal Opinion

Doumat v. Target Corporation

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01231Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 ZAINA DOUMAT, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01231-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Admissions and Denying Motion for 5 v. Summary Judgment 6 TARGET CORPORATION, [ECF Nos. 23, 24] 7 Defendant 8 Plaintiff Zaina Doumat sued defendant Target Corporation for negligence in this slip and 9 fall case. Target moves for summary judgment based on Doumat’s failure to timely answer 10 Target’s requests for admission (RFAs), which effectively absolve Target of all liability. Target 11 also argues that Doumat has not presented adequate evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Mitchell SteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. New York v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Barkley v. United States, Washington Territory1888
  5. Ostrander v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API