Legal Opinion

Martin v. Johnston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Nemaha county. Tried below before Appelg-et, J. cited: State Natl. Bank v. Haylen, 14 Neb., 480; Lowe v. Higgenbotham, 13 Pac. Rep. [Kan.], 790; Hawkins v. Wilson, 32 N. AY. Rep. [Ia.], 416; Harrison v. Baker, 15 Neb., 43; Simpson v. Armstrong, 20 Id., 512; Dunbier v. Day, 12 Id., 597; Juergens v. Thorn, 40 N. AY. Rep. [Minn.], 559; Erben v. Lorrillard, 19 N. Y., 302; Furst v. R. Co., 72 N. Y., 546; Miller v. Ottaway, 45 N. AY.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Nemaha county. Tried below before Appelg-et, J. cited: State Natl. Bank v. Haylen, 14 Neb., 480; Lowe v. Higgenbotham, 13 Pac. Rep. [Kan.], 790; Hawkins v. Wilson, 32 N. AY. Rep. [Ia.], 416; Harrison v. Baker, 15 Neb., 43; Simpson v. Armstrong, 20 Id., 512; Dunbier v. Day, 12 Id., 597; Juergens v. Thorn, 40 N. AY. Rep. [Minn.], 559; Erben v. Lorrillard, 19 N. Y., 302; Furst v. R. Co., 72 N. Y., 546; Miller v. Ottaway, 45 N. AY. Rep. [Mich.], 666; Davis v. MeOready, 72 Am. Dec. [N. Y.], 462; Koehler v. Dodge, 31 Neb., 328; Roberts v. Lane, 18 Am. Dec. [Me.],…

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action upon a promissory note as follows:

“$5. Auburn, Neb., Nov. 20, 1889.
“ Ten months after date, for value received, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Geo. Hays eighty-five dollars, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, payable annually from date until paid; should any of said interest not be paid when due, it shall bear interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum from the time the same becomes due. Negotiable and payable at the First National Bank of Auburn, Neb.
“P. O. address, Howe, Neb.
“No. 748. Due Sept. 20, ’90.
“W. B.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Witte v. BrozNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. First National Bank v. PenningtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Norwood v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Second National Bank v. Snoqualmie Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Happ v. DuceyNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API