Legal Opinion

Olson v. Nebraska Telephone Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1909No. 15,574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Opinion on motion for rehearing of ease reported in 83 Neb. 735.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This cause has been submitted upon briefs and oral arguments supporting and resisting defendants’ application *332for a rehearing. We are satisfied that a rehearing ought not to be granted, but our former opinion will be modified.

1. The statement of facts heretofore made is correct, but will be extended somewhat as we proceed with the case. Defendants except to the first paragraph of the syllabus and the discussion in regard thereto. They argue that the printed notice given by the telephone company to plaintiff at the time he entered its employ is not a contract exempting the employer from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKay & Roche v. Southern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Electric Railway Co. v. SheltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Barto v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Nebraska Telephone Co. v. York Gas & Electric Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olson v. Nebraska Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wilkins v. Water & Light Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Swan v. Salt Lake & Ogden Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API