Legal Opinion

State v. Broussard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1942No. 36806PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Under our supervisory jurisdiction, we ordered the issuance of writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus to the district judge, who refused, in a habeas corpus proceeding, to impose a sentence of an indeterminate period of time instead of the sentence of a definite period of five years previously imposed upon the defendant, and thereby preventing him from obtaining bail pending the appeal from the conviction of the crime of carnal knowledge.

The basis of the trial judge’s ruling is twofold: (1) That an indeterminate sentence is mandatory only for those offenses where the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DierlammSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. State v. MischiroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. State v. MenardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. State v. NormandaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API