Legal Opinion

Bozeman v. Sloss Industries Corp.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided September 5, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 91-AR-0915-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

This is a case in which plaintiff, Carlos Bozeman, a black man, invokes Title VII and claims that because of his race he was discharged by his employer, Sloss Industries Corporation, the defendant. In an exercise of the discretion granted by Rule 39(c), F.R.Civ.P., this court “of its own initiative” (the language of the Rule), ordered the case tried with an advisory jury. Sloss promptly moved for reconsideration and for the vacation of the order providing for an advisory jury.

Sloss makes three arguments. First, Sloss points out that despite any advice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Fred MOSS, Jr., Appellant, v. the LANE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  3. 5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 374, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8093 Calvin A. Cox, Individually, and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Babcock and Wilcox Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Mary Ann Newmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Walker v. Anderson Electrical ConnectorsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. Shelby Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
  2. Lavalle-Cervantes v. International Hospitality Associates, S. en C. (SE)District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API