Legal Opinion

Doe v. Town of Stoughton

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 22, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-10467-PBSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Jane Doe, a former student in the Stoughton Public Schools, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants1 Brett Dickens, the principal, and Anthony Sarno, the Superintendent of Schools, failed to prevent other students from sexually harassing her in school. Defendants have moved to dismiss counts 4 and 5, which allege that they deprived Plaintiff of her statutory rights pursuant to Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681. Defendants argue that no § 1983 claim *162may be brought against an individual for violations…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Does v. Southeast Delco School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Doe v. Prosper Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2024
  3. John Harnois v. University of Massachusetts at DartmouthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  4. M.M. v. Tacoma School District No 10District Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API