Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 1916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Black Hawk District Contri. — Chas. W. Mullan, Judge. Conviction for seduction. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Salinger, J.. 1- argument otw: flammiiorny appeals. new trial. I. In an argument for the State, the prosecutor said, over objection, that he believed the crime of seduction was the most serious crime known to the statute books, though it did not carry a very serious penalty; that his reason for saying that this was, in his opinion, the most serious crime, wag -fog wrong done is not limited to the *381present actors, but continues into the second and third generation. He. pointed out the suffering of a child when it is visited by the contempt of its schoolmates, when it inquired of the mother what…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Rudd v. DeweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PeirceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. State v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. State v. BrowmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API