Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Seigel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110 to fix an attorney’s fee, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, S.), dated November 1, 2001, as fixed the attorney’s fee at $2,000, and directed that all moneys paid to the appellant and in his possession in excess of that amount, consisting of the sum of $50,500, be refunded to the estate.
Ordered that the decree is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, the second, third, and fourth decretal paragraphs are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bizar & Martin v. U.S. Ice Cream Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Estate of SmolleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Trief v. ElghanayanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Micro-Spy, Inc. v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State v. Cnty. of OneidaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- In re the Estate of SeigelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005