Legal Opinion
Bondi v. Pole
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 25, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
246 N.J. Super. 236 (1991)
587 A.2d 285
JOHN BONDI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL B. POLE, M.D. AND FOUAD K. MICHAIL, M.D., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 15, 1991.
Decided February 25, 1991.
Before Judges BRODY and GRUCCIO.
Robin G. Marks argued the cause for appellant (Francis J. Hartman, attorney; Robin G. Marks, on the brief).
Karen A. Kingsley argued the cause for respondent Samuel B. Pole, M.D. (Horn, Kaplan, Goldberg, Gorny & Daniels, attorneys; Karen A. Kingsley, on the brief).
Edwin R. Jonas, III, argued the cause for respondent Fouad…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Germann v. MatrissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Schulz v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Eckert v. Rumsey Park AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Vitrano v. SchiffmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.