Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1969No. Appeals, 703 and 747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the claimant and the defendant-employer both have appealed from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County remanding the case to the Board for the taking of additional testimony.

The employer appeals on the ground that the claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations and further that the decision of the Board is res adjudicaba as to the claim; the claimant appeals on the ground that the court erred in remanding for the purpose of taking additional medical testimony.

The case has a long and complex history beginning with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Gower v. MACKESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Lind v. Argo Lamp Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rice v. A. Steiert & Sons, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Wilder v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Cambria County Commissioners v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Fesh v. American Steel & Wire Division, United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Falls-Overfield Vocational School District v. DavisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API