Wine v. Black
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL WINE, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-704 (VAB) RONALD BLACK ET AL., Defendants. RULING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST Following an evidentiary hearing and before the start of trial, Christopher Drolet, Ivette Diaz, and Ronald Black (collectively, “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss Daniel Wine’s claim on the basis that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss based on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Williams v. Correction Officer PriatnoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.