Legal Opinion

Wine v. Black

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 11, 2024No. 3:18-cv-00704Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL WINE, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-704 (VAB) RONALD BLACK ET AL., Defendants. RULING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST Following an evidentiary hearing and before the start of trial, Christopher Drolet, Ivette Diaz, and Ronald Black (collectively, “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss Daniel Wine’s claim on the basis that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss based on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Williams v. Correction Officer PriatnoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API