Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Exe v. Hargreaves

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1988No. TC Nos. 10-85-01489, 10-87-00232; SC S34593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This mandamus proceeding involves two cases. As in State ex rel Ray Wells, Inc. v. Hargreaves, 306 Or 610, 761 P2d 1306 (1988) (also decided today), the question presented was the constitutionality of the judge-disqualification statutes. In both Wells and this proceeding, alternative writs were issued. In each proceeding, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In Wells, we held ORS 14.250 and 14.260(1), as amended by Oregon Laws 1987, chapter 338, to be constitutional. Here, however, we conclude that the affidavits required by statute were insufficient to support relator’s motions to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ray Wells, Inc. v. HargreavesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Yraguen v. DorrohOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oregon State Bar v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API