Legal Opinion

Ford v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 12, 1952No. Docket Nos. 9391, 9392, 9393Published

Petitioners Clarence B. Ford, Wade E. Moore, and Vern Forcum each originally had a 25 per cent interest in the Forcum-James Construction Company, a partnership, prior to 1940. In 1940 and 1941, each petitioner, with the consent of the other partners, transferred portions of his 25 per cent interest to members of his respective family.

Read the full summary

Petitioners Clarence B. Ford, Wade E. Moore, and Vern Forcum each originally had a 25 per cent interest in the Forcum-James Construction Company, a partnership, prior to 1940. In 1940 and 1941, each petitioner, with the consent of the other partners, transferred portions of his 25 per cent interest to members of his respective family. After such transfers a partnership agreement was entered into admitting to the partnership of Forcum-James Construction Company the parties to whom such transfers had been made. Held, these partnership agreements were entered into by the parties with a bona fide…

1Opinion of the Court

Clarence B. Ford, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Estate of Wade E. Moore, Deceased, Madge M. Moore, Executrix, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. Vern Forcum, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Ford v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 9391, 9392, 9393

United States Tax Court

19 T.C. 200; 1952 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48;

November 12, 1952, Promulgated

Decisions will be entered under Rule 50.

Petitioners Clarence B. Ford, Wade E. Moore, and Vern Forcum each originally had a 25 per cent interest in the Forcum-James Construction…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API