Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 2002No. A091877PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
115 Cal.Rptr.2d 342 (2002)
95 Cal.App.4th 154
Brent FERGUSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. A091877.
Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four.
January 11, 2002.
Review Granted May 1, 2002.
Adams Nye Sinunu Walker LLP, David J. Becht, Bruce Nye, San Francisco, Ross L. Libenson, for appellants.
Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Ethan P. Sehulman, Deborah A. Kane, San Francisco, for respondents.
REARDON, Acting P.J.
Appellants, objectors to a proposed class action settlement in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Parker v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 694, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,178 Adrian Mandujano, Daniel Perez and Fidel Gutierrez v. Basic Vegetable Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- O'Connor Agency, Inc. v. BrodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002