Legal Opinion

Wasserman v. Broadalbin Knitting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

In this action plaintiffs are seeking to recover damages sustained by them because of the alleged failure of defendant to deliver merchandise under a written contract of purchase and sale. Defendant denies that it breached its contract and pleads a counterclaim against plaintiffs because of their failure to comply with the contract. The Trial Judge dismissed the claims of both parties and from that determination both have come to this court.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The principal ones appear in the dissenting opinion and need not be repeated here.

Leibner and Friedman had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pierson & Co. v. Nederlandsch-Indische Maatschappij tot Voortzetting der Zaken Van Der LindeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. James Talcott, Inc. v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hodes v. Hoffman International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Expedia, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API