Legal Opinion

Lillian Agnes Wieland and Charles L. Wieland v. C. A. Swanson & Sons

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 1955No. 271, Docket 23134PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff wife was injured by swallowing, in a mouthful of canned chicken fricassee, some object which was hard and sharp enough to tear the lining of her esophagus. She and her husband sued the manufacturing processor on the theory that the injurious substance was introduced or permitted to remain in the chicken fricassee through the negligence of the processor. The court charged the jury that if it found that the injury was caused by a chicken bone, plaintiffs could not recover. 1 The jury verdict was for defendant and plaintiffs appeal.

The place of wrong was New…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woschenko v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Dunn v. Hoffman Beverage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  3. Simpson v. DuffyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryer v. Rath Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Gallagher v. Pequot Spring Water Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1963
  3. Maryland Ex Rel. Woodzell v. Garzell Plastics Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
  4. Kneibel v. RRM ENTERPRISESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Pennington v. D'IppolitoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API