Legal Opinion
Bates v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 21, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit by Jerome E. Bates against the United Shoe Machinery Company.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATi'IELD, District Judge.
This action was presented upon, an amended complaint, verified December 27, 1905, and an answer thereto, verified February 15, 1906. Issue having been joined by the filing of a replication, testimony was taken and filed and the case argued in 1912, upon the printed proofs. The statement of facts is complicated, and the conclusions to be drawn from the different items of testimony are more difficult, generally speaking, than the determination of what occurred on the different occasions named. Few of these facts are disputed, and, as these can be referred to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. President of the Portland BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- O'Neil v. Wolcott Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Real Estate Trust Co. v. BirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Snelling v. RichardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Ford-Rennie Leather Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1924
- Girdwood v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- Gordon's Dry Gin Co. v. Eddy & Fisher Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1917
- Thomas Branch & Co. v. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924